Unrivalled coverage. No paywall.

Chegg, Inc. (CHGG)

We are unregulated and this is not investment advice. See legal disclaimer for more details.

Summary

Chegg provides online education services but faces severe disruption from AI tools. While actively restructuring (layoffs, institutional focus), fundamental metrics show accelerating decline. High-risk speculative play on turnaround execution.

Bull Case

If Chegg successfully monetizes its university partnerships and integrates AI to complement rather than compete with its services, the current valuation (0.15x P/S) could re-rate upward. Cost cuts from layoffs might restore profitability by late 2025.

Bear Case

Accelerating subscriber loss to free AI tools could render Chegg’s model obsolete within 12-18 months. With only $44M cash and negative operating margins, bankruptcy risk rises if institutional sales fail to offset consumer declines.

Recent News

Financial Analysis

  • Revenue declined 30.4% YoY in Q1 2025 ($121.4M vs. $174.4M in Q1 2024).
  • Gross margin collapsed to 55.5% in Q1 2025 from 73.3% YoY.
  • Negative free cash flow in 3 of last 5 quarters, with Q1 2025 FCF at $15.9M (improvement from -$3.6M in Q2 2024).
  • Cash reserves fell 72.7% QoQ to $44.1M (March 2025) vs. $161.5M (December 2024).
  • Price/Sales of 0.15 (May 2025) suggests market skepticism about growth revival.
  • Negative ROE (-9.4% in Q1 2025) indicates inefficient equity utilization.
  • Quick ratio of 0.42 (March 2025) signals liquidity risk despite layoffs.
  • Debt/Equity improved to 0.46 (March 2025) from 2.61 (December 2024) via balance sheet restructuring.

Chegg’s core homework-help model faces existential threat from free AI tools (Gemini, ChatGPT), compounded by global trade contraction impacting discretionary education spending. While cost-cutting provides short-term relief, structural revenue decline (-30% YoY) and eroding gross margins suggest business model obsolescence risks.

Screener Ratings

Compare over 5500 companies with our screener ratings at AIpha.io.

Overall: 2
Speculative turnaround story with high execution risk in collapsing core market.

Value: 3
Cheap valuation (0.15x P/S) reflects high bankruptcy risk rather than margin of safety.

Growth: 2
Revenue contraction (-30% YoY) and AI substitution limit growth prospects.

Dividend: 1
No dividend history and negative earnings preclude distributions.

Defensive: 2
High beta (1.75) and discretionary service nature make it vulnerable in downturns.

Moat: 1
No sustainable competitive advantages against AI competitors.

S.W.O.T. Analysis

Strengths:

  • Existing university partnerships
  • Proprietary content library

Weaknesses:

  • Negative EPS (-$0.17 in Q1 2025)
  • Declining web traffic
  • High beta (1.75)

Opportunities:

  • Institutional sales expansion
  • AI integration for personalized learning

Threats:

  • Existential AI competition
  • Macro-driven education budget cuts

Industry Overview

Threat of New Competitors: Moderate: Low capital requirements for AI-driven competitors but Chegg’s content library provides partial barrier.

Competition Among Existing Firms: High: Direct competition from OpenAI/ChatGPT and indirect pressure from Google’s AI Overviews.

Suppliers’ Bargaining Power: Low: Reliant on freelance educators/academics with abundant alternatives.

Buyers’ Bargaining Power: High: Students can switch to free AI tools instantly.

Threat of Substitute Products: Extreme: Generative AI provides comparable services at near-zero marginal cost.

Competitive Advantage

Cost Advantage: None: Negative operating margins (-22.2% in Q1 2025) indicate no scale benefits.

Intangible Assets: Weak: Content library being eroded by AI, though university partnerships provide temporary edge.

Network Effect: None: Platform usage doesn’t improve with more users.

Switching Costs: Low: Students can transition to AI tools without penalty.

Warning: This document has been generated by an advanced customised AI prompted with financial data derived from company filings and other reputable sources. The process is specifically designed to minimise hallucinations, however the output is not 100% reliable. It is essential to check any information in this document before relying on it for financial decisions. You can find the underlying data used here.

Download Analysis PDF

© Copyright 2024. All rights reserved.